Chesapeake
Environmental Protection Association Past CEPA Forums Every
year, CEPA sponsors a public forum on an important environmental topic. The objective
is to select a timely subject and to present it in depth. Too often newspapers
and other media present only part of an issue, and then tell us brief opinions
of various politicians or experts. For our forums, we invite established authorities
capable of discussing the subject in depth, and usually have more than one speaker
to get different perspectives. The public is always given an opportunity to ask
questions. The forums are usually held in Anne Arundel County. In past forums,
we have found that a good attendance depends on a concerted advertising effort.
A nominal fee is requested to cover advertising costs, with any excess going to
the Chesapeake Bay Trust.2010 Annual Forum: The Health of the
Bay and YouThe 2010 forum held February 26, featured J. Charles Chuck
Fox, Special Asst. to the EPA Administrator for the Chesapeake Bay and Tom Horton,
Environmentalist and Author 2009 Annual
Forum: Stream Restoration On Friday evening, February 27, 2009
CEPA held a forum on stream restoration at the Southern High School in Harwood.
The forum was moderated by Rich Romer, a CEPA Trustee, and the speakers were Ron
Bowen, Anne Arundel County Director of Public Works, Erik Mikelsen, Executive
Director of the South River Federation, and Dr. Margaret Palmer, Director of the
University of Maryland's Chesapeake Biological Laboratory at Solomons. Ron
Bowen pointed out that most of Anne Arundel County was developed years ago before
the damaging effects of stormwater were properly accounted for and managed. Only
in recent years have we have learned how to deal with stormwater and do so properly
with respect to new construction. But that leaves the damage from hundreds of
years of development. The damage to historic streams from stormwater runoff from
our older developments needs to be retrofitted with effective stormwater management
systems. Bowen stated that all major Anne Arundel County waterways are now
classified as impaired. A number of individual streams have been restored, such
as Howard's Branch, at the Edgewater Elementary School, and at Shipley's Choice.
However, the cost of restoring all the streams that need it and of correcting
all the runoff problems is far beyond what the County can afford in the near future.
Bowen admitted that the situation presents a bleak picture. Impervious areas
in Anne Arundel County cover 17% of our land, and that amount of impervious surface
is known to create problems with respect to water quality, particularly in reducing
wildlife diversity. The County Council is considering legislation which would
require enhanced nitrogen removal systems for new septic tanks in the County,
which will reduce nitrogen flow into the Bay If we are to get our rivers off the
impaired list, we also need to change our behavior with respect to fertilizing
our lawns, using rain barrels and rain gardens, etc. Even using proper stormwater
management practices with new construction, Bowen estimates that after the County
is built out, 95% of runoff pollution will come from existing development, emphasizing
the need for retrofitting older stormwater management systems. In order
to understand the present status of our streams, Erik Michelsen talked about man's
influences throughout our history. In 1608, before we altered the land, there
were many beaver dams to slow streams down and allow the water to seep back into
the ground. Early settlers constructed many mill dams, which also slowed down
the streams, but which caused silt to accumulate behind the dams. As the dams
were removed or allowed to deteriorate, the streams eroded a path through the
silt, often several meters thick, and left steep banks without any vegetation.
For many years, as development occurred, developers felt the best way to "restore"
streams was to channel them to get water to rivers or bays as directly as possible.
With no chance for the water to soak into the ground, this increased the amount
of agricultural sediment and pollution from runoff which flowed directly into
the rivers and bays. Now we are aware of a number of techniques that slow
down streams, using a series of pools, for example, which allow the water to soak
in. Also, sand filters can be used between pools. The Wilelinor development at
the intersection of Aris T. Allen and Southern Maryland Boulevards (MD Routes
665 and 2) is a good example of new restoration techniques. Mikelsen reported
that the South River Federation plans some stream restoration work in Church Creek,
with help from grants. Some studies suggest that water quality is significantly
affected when impervious surface in the watershed reaches about 10%. However,
Margaret Palmer pointed out that there is no abrupt decrease in wildlife at that
point. Some species can tolerate more and some less. She explained that
some past stream restoration projects attempted to recreate the conditions that
used to be present. Often that is difficult, and often that is not the best way
to restore streams. Enough conclusive studies have been made that the results
of those studies should guide how restoration is done. That would definitely include
such things as step pools and wetlands. Studies also indicate that restoration
doesn't necessarily mean that biodiversity will rebound. Dr. Palmer feels
the single most effective way to reduce runoff and pollution for a reasonable
cost is to preserve forests and plant trees, particularly in the buffer areas
adjacent to streams and the Bay. Often, large sums of money are spent on very
effective stream restoration, but she feels the same amount of money would be
far more effective if it were reallocated to preserving and planting trees.
2008
Annual Forum: Groundwater NEW:
Click to download the complete presentation, "Protecting Maryland's Water
Supply" by the keynote speaker, Dr. Robert Summers (PDF)
On Friday,
February 29, 2008, the CHESAPEAKE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (CEPA)
held a forum on Ground Water at the South River High School Auditorium in Edgewater.
The forum was moderated by CEPA Trustee Rich Romer, and the keynote speaker was
Dr. Robert Summers, Deputy Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE).
Dr Summers started by explaining the differences in the hydrology and water usage
in different parts of the state. Western Maryland has mostly fractured rock aquifers,
and, due to the relatively low population density, the water is predominately
used for thermoelectric and industrial purposes. Thermoelectric refers to cooling
water for coal, oil, and nuclear power plants. The limited amount of water in
fractured rock is running out. In Central Maryland, which includes Baltimore and
north and west of Baltimore, the water is used mostly for public supply and thermoelectric
purposes. Southern Maryland gets most of its water from several aquifers, and
uses it primarily for public supply and domestic use. The water levels in the
aquifers have been declining significantly over the last 30 years or more. And
the recharge zones in the northern and western parts of the area are being paved
over. On the Eastern Shore, water is used primarily for irrigation. The
Governors Bob Ehrlich and then Martin OMalley appointed the Water Resources
Advisory Committee on which Dr. Summers serves. The Committee has studied demands
for water and made a number of recommendations for management of our water supply.
In 2004, it issued its first report, recommending a comprehensive evaluation of
existing aquifer and watershed water supplies. This involves adding stream gauges,
observation wells, and other monitoring mechanisms to what already exists. For
example, the number of observation wells should be increased from 141 to 240.
Such a study has already been initiated in Southern Maryland, but has been hampered
by lack of funding. An interim report issued by the Advisory Committee in
2006 recommended conservation measures, wastewater recycling technologies, and
studied desalination and water storage methods (reservoirs). These measures will
be necessary with the population of Maryland expected to increase by more than
one million (to 6.3 million) in the next 25 years. In 2007, a bill passed
the General Assembly (House Bill 1141) which requires that water resources be
an element in the comprehensive development plans of local governments, i.e. Counties
and municipalities. Along with other committee recommendations, this would cost
an average of $7 million per year for the next 7 years. That funding is not in
place at this time, and the Advisory Committee is trying to identify possible
funding sources. During the Question and Answer period, Mike Shay used the
example of a particular golf course in Anne Arundel County which uses great amounts
of water, and he asked Dr. Summers why that sort of thing is not controlled by
water appropriation permits. Dr. Summers would like to see that sort of water
usage controlled, but stated that there is public resistance to controlling something
that historically was free for everybody. Dr. M. Gordon Wolman, Professor
of Environmental Engineering at Johns Hopkins University and Chairman of the Water
Resources Advisory Committee, was the next speaker. He said that it is no longer
possible for everybody to use the aquifers and tributaries without restrictions.
He feels that the recommendations of the Advisory Committee are necessary for
managing the water supply, but says that the two reports they have issued so far
were met with a deafening silence from the political world. Dr.
Wolman feels that the legislation currently being considered, and the present
state of mind in the Maryland General Assembly is such that no significant progress
will be made this year. He feels that the major hurdle is to educate and persuade
the legislature that the Advisory Committees recommendations must be put
into effect. That would include the funding necessary to establish a structure
for fees and permits and for ensuring that water resources are considered in local
comprehensive plans. One issue that apparently remains to be settled is
the amount of water that can be withdrawn from our rivers without adversely affecting
the environment or other uses such as fishing, boating, and swimming. A compromise
will probably be necessary. Robert Shedlock, Associate District Chief &
Supervisory Hydrologist, US Geological Survey went into greater detail on the
types and characteristics of aquifers in different parts of Maryland. He spoke
about USGS efforts to establish an Aquifer Information System, which would map
the depths, thicknesses, etc. of all our aquifers, and model the soils with respect
to, among other things, how easily water passes through them. The results should
allow a determination of where wells can be dug, how deep, and how much water
can be withdrawn without detriment. At present, the process is largely trial and
error. With this data on hand, the permitting process could be controlled and
managed. The system is being developed, but, again, adequate funding has been
lacking. Shedlock stated that the earliest a working aquifer model could be available
was 2013. The speakers and several audience members mentioned the severe
droughts in our region in 2002 and again in 2007 which resulted in water restrictions
and/or development limitations in several Maryland locations. In addition to much
better water allocation, several new water "sources" could be utilized:
* Enhanced conservation * Expanded wastewater use * Possible desalination
* Additional storage facilities All agreed that water use based on the
assumption of continued plentiful supply can no longer continue in much of our
area. This page was last updated September 19, 2011. |